<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coding standards are critical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikesmullin.com/development/coding-standards-are-critical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikesmullin.com/development/coding-standards-are-critical/</link>
	<description>Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard K Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesmullin.com/development/coding-standards-are-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard K Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesmullin.com/coding-standards-are-critical#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on tabs and markup case.

The other big questions for a PHP developer:

* UPPERCASE, lowercase, camelCase, or under_scores for function names and variables? 

* Does the left brace ({) go on the same line as the if() and while() statements, or on the next line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on tabs and markup case.</p>
<p>The other big questions for a <acronym title="Pre-Hypertext Processing">PHP</acronym> developer:</p>
<p>* UPPERCASE, lowercase, camelCase, or under_scores for function names and variables? </p>
<p>* Does the left brace ({) go on the same line as the if() and while() statements, or on the next line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Haris</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesmullin.com/development/coding-standards-are-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Haris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesmullin.com/coding-standards-are-critical#comment-48</guid>
		<description>&quot;Function names should always be in camelCase.&quot;

It is not necessary to use camelCase.

According to Drupal:
&quot;Functions and methods should be named using lower caps and words should be separated with an underscore.&quot;

You should include more examples for beginners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Function names should always be in camelCase.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is not necessary to use camelCase.</p>
<p>According to Drupal:<br />
&#8220;Functions and methods should be named using lower caps and words should be separated with an underscore.&#8221;</p>
<p>You should include more examples for beginners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Young</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesmullin.com/development/coding-standards-are-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesmullin.com/coding-standards-are-critical#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big fan of Java&#039;s coding conventions personally.  They&#039;re actually on the Sun Certified Java Programmer exam.

http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/

(Some of the text of your article is from this page, so I assume you already have a link to it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of Java&#8217;s coding conventions personally.  They&#8217;re actually on the Sun Certified Java Programmer exam.</p>
<p><a href="http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/" rel="nofollow">http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/</a></p>
<p>(Some of the text of your article is from this page, so I assume you already have a link to it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikesmullin</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesmullin.com/development/coding-standards-are-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-8743</link>
		<dc:creator>mikesmullin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesmullin.com/coding-standards-are-critical#comment-8743</guid>
		<description>Thanks Haris! Good point; I have updated the article to reflect it. I appreciate your feedback.
Readers can follow the link to the PEAR Coding Standards to see even more in-depth examples coupled with explanations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Haris! Good point; I have updated the article to reflect it. I appreciate your feedback.<br />
Readers can follow the link to the PEAR Coding Standards to see even more in-depth examples coupled with explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesmullin.com/development/coding-standards-are-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-8801</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesmullin.com/coding-standards-are-critical#comment-8801</guid>
		<description>In my work using many different languages to program various types of programs from desktop applications to web apps to command line utilities, I have found that following the standards set forth by the individual groups works the best and feels the best to me. For example although Microsoft&#039;s C#.NET and Sun&#039;s Java coding styles are similar, they have several differences, and because I learned to code Java the Java way, doesn&#039;t make it right to code in C# that way. It makes things a little more complex to begin with, but IDEs usually favor one coding style over another for a particular language. Try coding Ruby the C++ way -- you will find that fellow Ruby coders will become confused or may taunt you for writing way too much code to do something so simple. Coding becomes inherently a language or dialect which is used to communicate with others. I find it therefore very important to do things the way the language creator did it. Write C# the C# way, Java the Java way, Ruby the Ruby way, and so on. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my work using many different languages to program various types of programs from desktop applications to web apps to command line utilities, I have found that following the standards set forth by the individual groups works the best and feels the best to me. For example although Microsoft&#8217;s C#.NET and Sun&#8217;s Java coding styles are similar, they have several differences, and because I learned to code Java the Java way, doesn&#8217;t make it right to code in C# that way. It makes things a little more complex to begin with, but IDEs usually favor one coding style over another for a particular language. Try coding Ruby the C++ way &#8212; you will find that fellow Ruby coders will become confused or may taunt you for writing way too much code to do something so simple. Coding becomes inherently a language or dialect which is used to communicate with others. I find it therefore very important to do things the way the language creator did it. Write C# the C# way, Java the Java way, Ruby the Ruby way, and so on. <img src='http://www.mikesmullin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

